Understanding and Enhancing the Community Value of Traditional Retail Markets in UK Cities, 2018-2020

DOI

This dataset has been supplied by the project ‘Understanding and Enhancing the Community Value of Traditional Retail Markets in UK cities’ (Project Reference: ES/P010547/1) conducted by the University of Leeds, the Open University, the National Market Traders Federation, and the New Economics Foundation. The dataset contains interview transcripts, workshop notes, and focus group transcripts that are applicable for qualitative analysis, and survey data that is applicable for statistical analysis. The qualitative dataset includes transcripts of interviews, workshops, and focus groups about the community value of Traditional Retail Markets (TRM); the context and particularities of Bury Market, Grainger Market, and Queen’s Market; and the market users’ everyday life experiences of these three markets. The quantitative dataset includes the responses of Bury Market, Grainger Market, and Queen’s Market users regarding the economic, social, and cultural value of these markets from a user perspective. Supporting documentation for the qualitative data includes a Data listing, Information sheets, Consent forms, and Topic guides (Full list in ReadMe file). Supporting documentation for the quantitative data includes Recruitment leaflets, Information sheets, Questionnaires, and Variables description (Full list in ReadMe file). More information about the project can be found at https://trmcommunityvalue.leeds.ac.uk/.Traditional Retail Markets (TRM) have played a significant role in UK’s towns and cities for centuries but their central community role is threatened by radical changes in retail trends, public sector cuts and, more recently, the increased pressures created by the COVID-19 crisis. Our study provides a new way to understand the community value which traditional markets offer, which we have defined as constituted by three interconnected dimensions: 1. Economic: TRMs as places that provide affordable food, products and services as well as create opportunities for low-cost business start-ups. 2. Social: TRMs as platforms for social mobility and the development of community ties and trust leading to better social inclusion. 3. Cultural: TRMs as spaces for experiencing a diversity of cultures and ethnicities and provide a sense of place for migrants, ethnic minorities and generally vulnerable citizens. Between February 2018 and September 2021, this project has collected and analysed qualitative and quantitative data to propose a new understanding of the community value that markets can bring about. In addition to reviewing industry, academic, community, media and policy publications to understand the current national and international public discourse around traditional markets, we developed a mixed methods, collaborative and action-oriented research approach. We interviewed over 50 experts and ran workshops with policymakers, market traders, market operators and managers, and representatives from charity organisations and community groups. In order to gain an in-depth understanding of market users’ experiences, we surveyed 1500 market users and run 6 focus groups in three case-study markets: Bury Market, Grainger Market, and Queen's Market. To extend the potential of this study and have a real societal impact, we have co-produced our research with non-academic partners from the TRM sector (National Market Traders Federation, NMTF) and experts in community economics (New Economics Foundation, NEF). In this way, we have developed usable outputs and tools to support the work of all the groups we have worked with.

Interviews were conducted with key informants with TRM responsibilities at the UK local and national level, as well as with TRM international experts; workshops with market managers and traders were held as breakout sessions during the NABMA and NMTF annual conferences (September 2018 and April 2019 respectively); and the workshop with campaigners was organised by the research team in November 2018. (See below for the objectives of each set of semi-structured interviews). The research team developed a set of criteria to select three case study markets. These criteria stated that these three markets should be large enough to support a 500-customer survey, have strong economic, social, and cultural roles and serve a diversity of customers. The team also selected markets in which both the operator and traders were interested in and broadly supportive of the research. Survey design was undertaken by the research team, in consultation with Fieldwork Assistance, an independent market research agency. Survey piloting took place in January and February 2019. The final data collection was conducted on behalf of the University of Leeds by Fieldwork Assistance. Fieldwork Assistance collected data from up to 500 market users (denoting customers/visitors) in each market, capturing a representative sample in terms of age, gender, and ethnicity based on the best available data. At Bury Market, the survey was conducted over 30 days in March 2019; at Grainger Market, the survey was conducted over 15 days during March 2019; and at Queen’s Market, the survey was conducted over 15 days during March and April 2019. Data collection was conducted across the full range of days and hours that each market is usually open. At Queen’s Market, recruitment leaflets, information sheets, and the survey questionnaire were translated and interpreted into Bengali, Gujarati, and Urdu to secure the participation of Asian women who either did not speak English and/or would not otherwise have spoken in public to an unknown fieldworker at Queen’s Market. Interviewers were accompanied by interpreters that were recruited through the support of a local community group in Newham. Gender, age, and ethnicity quotas were established to recruit survey participants as follows: a) At Bury Market: Female: 70%, Male: 30%; 18-30 years: 10%, 31-49 years: 25%, 50-59 years: 15%, 60-69 years: 35%, 70+ years: 15%; White: 90%, Non-white: 20%. b) At Grainger Market: Female: 70%, Male: 30%; 18-30 years: 15%, 31-49 years: 20%, 50-59 years: 10%, 60-69 years: 35%, 70+ years: 20%; White: 90%, Non-white: 20%. c) At Queen’s Market: Female: 70%, Male: 30%; 18-30 years: 5%, 31-49 years: 15%, 50-59 years: 30%, 60-69 years: 30%, 70+ years: 20%; White: 20%, Asian: 55%, Black: 25%. Two 90-minute focus groups were also organised at each case study market, with survey respondents selected from typically underrepresented or vulnerable user groups, which wider academic research tells us benefit most from the community value of markets: a) At Bury Market: one focus group was run with market users over 50 years old and a second focus group with market users living in relatively more deprived areas. b) At Grainger Market: one focus group was run with market users over 50 years old and a second focus group with market users living in low-income neighbourhoods. c) At Queen’s Market: one focus group was run with female market users who described their ethnic group as Asian or Asian British and a second focus group with market users who described their ethnic group as Black or Black British.

Identifier
DOI https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-855090
Metadata Access https://datacatalogue.cessda.eu/oai-pmh/v0/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_ddi25&identifier=74af4db102a23652511e4ffe80e0b732e94701e506c8ebb9fe606c137e6b99a9
Provenance
Creator Gonzalez, S, University of Leeds; Taylor, M, University of Leeds; Wilkinson, R, University of Leeds; Newing, A, University of Leeds; Buckner, L, University of Leeds; Clarke, G, University of Leeds; Waley, P, University of Leeds; Watson, S, Open University; Northrop, F, New Economics Foundation; Bua, A, De Montfort University; Savage, C, National Market Traders Federation
Publisher UK Data Service
Publication Year 2021
Funding Reference ESRC
Rights Sara Gonzalez, University of Leeds; The Data Collection is available from an external repository. Access is available via Related Resources.
OpenAccess true
Representation
Language English
Resource Type Numeric; Text
Discipline Economics; Social and Behavioural Sciences
Spatial Coverage England, United Kingdom; Barcelona, Spain; United Kingdom; Spain