COVID-19 Frontline Staff in Rapidly Formed COVID-19 Teams in the NHS: Implications for Leadership, Team-working, Career Intentions and Individual Mental Health, 2020-2022

DOI

A set of interviews with NHS COVID-19 frontline staff to investigate the influence of COVID deployment on non-technical factors for healthcare delivery (leadership, social support & cohesion, communication, shared mental models, co-ordination) and expected moderating factors (occupational background, preparedness, work-life balance and home situation, proximity, workforce allocation models) and the impact on perceived teamwork, performance, individual team member well-being, resilience and team member employment retention intentions for NHS COVID-team members. The interviews with medical staff consisted of demographic questions collecting some special category data (e.g., ethnicity, job title, living arrangements during COVID), a 12-item standardised measure of wellbeing (administered using the GHQ-12, a short form General Health Questionnaire) and an 8 item Work Life Balance Scale (Schwartz et al., 2019; Sexton et al., 2017). These are not included in the interview transcripts. The interview schedule then followed a topic based semi-structured component (informed by themes identified in our previous work (Reid et al., 2018; 2016; Schilling, 2019), the wider literature, and our preliminary conceptual framework across these four main areas: 1) the creation of teams and the experience of teamwork, social support, shared communication patterns, co- ordination and mental models; 2) the role of leaders in establishing teamwork, social support, shared communication patterns, co-ordination and mental models; 3) perceived individual and team performance, well-being, resilience and retention intentions; 4) moderating factors including occupational background, preparedness, home life, work-life balance and any other issues arising during COVID-team membership.A key component of the NHS (and global) response to the COVID-19 pandemic has been to reinforce acute and critical care capacity, through an unprecedented re-deployment of personnel from different care pathways into fluid teams consisting of volunteers, student doctors and nurses, and in some cases military personnel [1-4]. These COVID-teams provide a unique opportunity to examine the interaction of many of the established factors for successful delivery of medical teamwork and care. Current evidence suggests that without common teamwork, shared communication patterns and clear leadership structures, the ad-hoc and fluid nature of these COVID-teams increases risk to patient outcomes, delivery of care [5-9] and team member resilience, mental-health and retention [10,11]. This project will examine how non-technical factors for healthcare delivery (leadership, social support; cohesion, communication, shared mental models, co-ordination) and expected moderating factors (occupational background, preparedness, work-life balance, home situation, proximity, workforce allocation models) impact on perceived COVID-teamworking and performance, individual team member well-being and team member employment retention intentions. It will be a mixed methods cross-sectional exploratory study of COVID-team members, clinical directors and senior hospital managers across a wide range of partnered NHS Trusts. Qualitative interviews will identify key themes and will be followed up by a more widely recruited confirmatory survey examining longer term individual well-being and retention intentions.

Participant recruitment for the interviews was through two methods 1) Identification of eligible potential participants through the NHS research sites. Potential participants identified by relevant staff in the NHS Trusts. This will be achieved by asking the NHS research sites to identify relevant gate keepers in the trust who can identify eligible potential participants (those staff who have previously or currently have worked in Covid-teams and clinical directors/managers). Those gate keepers forwarded a recruitment email provided by the researchers for the eligible potential participants. Participants were then contacted and guided to the study website, reading the participant information and completing the online consent form. 2) Self-identification through a UK wide recruitment call, using Linkedin, twitter and facebook adverts. Potential participants will identify through visiting the study website, reading the participant information and completing the online consent form. Once the consent form was received (either online or via email) by the research team then participants were contacted by the research team, and provided a copy of the PIS form, the privacy notice and asked to schedule an interview. Only participants who are eligible (i.e., have worked on a COVID ward) and completed informed consent were contacted for an interview. Upon start of the interview, participants were again asked verbally for their informed consent. Participants are all adults over the age of 18 and will either have worked in a critical care COVID ward/ HDU in a patient facing role. Participants were interviewed individually online with video and audio by a researcher using a standardised schedule.

Identifier
DOI https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-856323
Metadata Access https://datacatalogue.cessda.eu/oai-pmh/v0/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_ddi25&identifier=4773674c34bd77484744dd34bb8d0c23148cbb54a549d41d8988f7e517f60b2c
Provenance
Creator Connelly, V, Oxford Brookes University; Schilling, S, Oxford Brookes University; Armou, M, Oxford Brookes University; Carding, P, Oxford Brookes University; Bricknell, M, Kings College London; Morrison, Z, Robert Gordon University
Publisher UK Data Service
Publication Year 2023
Funding Reference ESRC
Rights Vince Connelly, Oxford Brookes University. Stefan Schilling, Oxford Brookes University. Maria Armou, Oxford Brookes University. Paul Carding, Oxford Brookes University. Martin Bricknell, Kings College London. Zoe Morrison, Robert Gordon University; The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service. All requests are subject to the permission of the data owner or his/her nominee. Please email the contact person for this data collection to request permission to access the data, explaining your reason for wanting access to the data, then contact our Access Helpdesk.
OpenAccess true
Representation
Language English
Resource Type Text
Discipline Psychology; Social and Behavioural Sciences
Spatial Coverage United Kingdom; United Kingdom