Arkielämä ja ulkonäkö 2016

DOI

Kyselyssä selvitettiin vastaajien suhdetta ulkonäköön sekä ulkonäön merkitystä arjessa ja yleisemmin suomalaisessa yhteiskunnassa. Arkielämä ja ulkonäkö -kyselytutkimus on kerätty osana tutkimushanketta Suomi ulkonäköyhteiskuntana: väestötason tarkastelu ulkonäköä koskevista arvoista, asenteista, normeista ja niiden muutoksesta. Kysely on jatkoa vuonna 2011 kerätylle Arkielämä ja hyvinvointi -kyselylle. Kysely alkaa ulkonäköön ja siihen kohdistuvaan kulutukseen liittyvillä kysymyksillä. Seuraavaksi selvitetään laajasti vastaajan suhdetta omaan ulkonäköönsä ja sen vaikutuksiin elämässä. Edelleen kysytään niin perinteisen median kuin sosiaalisen ja verkkomedian käytöstä. Lopuksi kysytään vielä siitä, miten vastaaja viettää vapaa-aikaansa ja millaisia harrastuksia hänellä on. Kysely toteutettiin split ballot -tekniikalla: puolet vastaajista vastasivat miehiä koskeviin väitteisiin ja puolet naisia koskeviin väitteisiin kysymyksissä 20 ja 21. Taustamuuttujina ovat muun muassa vastaajan syntymävuosi, sukupuoli, elämäntilanne, koulutustaso, talouden koko, tulotaso sekä ammatti (ISCO-08-luokitus). Lisäksi mahdollisen puolison ammatti sekä puolison ja vastaajan vanhempien koulutustaso.

The survey charted the role of physical appearance in the respondents' everyday life as well as more generally in Finnish society. The survey was conducted as part of the 'Finland as an appearance society: A population level study of values, attitudes, norms and their changes' research project. The survey continues to study the topics of the Everyday life and Well-being survey collected in 2011. First, the respondents' consumer habits were examined with questions on how often they had bought products related to physical appearance (e.g. clothes, makeup, perfume) in the past 12 months and whether they had bought any of the products from an online store. The respondents were also asked if they had, for example, ever got a piercing or a tattoo, been on a diet, or used workout supplements. The next questions surveyed the importance of physical appearance to the respondents, how the respondents would evaluate their own appearance when compared to their peers, and whether they had received positive or negative comments about their appearance at different points of their lives. Additionally, the respondents were asked whether they thought their appearance had had a positive or negative effect on different elements of their lives (e.g. finding a partner, getting a job, overall satisfaction in life). Various statements related to physical appearance, such as whether the respondents thought they took good care of their appearance, often took pictures of themselves, and had good posture, were also included in the survey. Views on the significance and role of physical appearance in Finnish society were examined next. The respondents were asked to what extent they approved or disapproved various actions, such as exercising to achieve better physical appearance or consciously taking advantage of good looks to get a job, when done by men or women. For these questions (20 and 21), the respondents were divided in half using the split ballot method so that half of the respondents were presented with statements about women and half with statements about men. Next, the respondents' media use was examined. Questions included, for example, how often the respondents watched TV, read books or used the Internet, and for what purposes they used the Internet and how often (e.g. email, online shopping, social media). Finally, the respondents' well-being and perceived social status were charted. The respondents were asked how they would describe their happiness, satisfaction in life, health, and self-esteem, how often they met other people during their leisure time, and how often they were in contact with others through the Internet. The respondents' perceived social class and hobbies were also surveyed. Background variables included, among others, the respondent's year of birth, gender, economic activity and occupational status, level of education, household size, income, and occupation (ISCO-08 classification). Additionally, the occupation of the respondent's spouse/partner and the level of education of the respondent's parents and the parents of their spouse/partner were charted.

Todennäköisyysotanta: yksinkertainen satunnaisotantaProbability.SimpleRandom

Probability: Simple randomProbability.SimpleRandom

Itsetäytettävä lomake: paperinen lomakeSelfAdministeredQuestionnaire.Paper

Itsetäytettävä lomake: verkkolomakeSelfAdministeredQuestionnaire.CAWI

Self-administered questionnaire: PaperSelfAdministeredQuestionnaire.Paper

Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI)SelfAdministeredQuestionnaire.CAWI

Identifier
DOI https://doi.org/10.60686/t-fsd3499
Source https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD3499
Metadata Access https://datacatalogue.cessda.eu/oai-pmh/v0/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_ddi25&identifier=e9036e18bb8264ec31f7ddda84677fce8b8d0106ab602d214de13dd74feefbef
Provenance
Creator Koivula, Aki 0000-0002-8453-0863; Kukkonen, Iida 0000-0001-9637-918X; Sarpila, Outi 0000-0002-3795-0638
Publisher Yhteiskuntatieteellinen tietoarkisto; Finnish Social Science Data Archive
Publication Year 2023
Rights Yhteiskuntatieteellinen tietoarkisto; Finnish Social Science Data Archive; Tietoarkiston ja aineiston luovuttajan tekemän sopimuksen mukaisesti.; In accordance with the agreement between FSD and the depositor.; Aineisto on käytettävissä (C) vain tutkimukseen ja ylempiin opinnäytteisiin.; The dataset is (C) available only for research including master's theses.
OpenAccess true
Contact https://www.fsd.tuni.fi/
Representation
Resource Type Kvantitatiivinen; Quantitative
Discipline Agriculture, Forestry, Horticulture, Aquaculture; Agriculture, Forestry, Horticulture, Aquaculture and Veterinary Medicine; Life Sciences; Social Sciences; Social and Behavioural Sciences; Soil Sciences
Spatial Coverage Suomi; Finland; Suomi; Finland