V okviru sklopa vprašanj o slovenski identiteti in zgodovini se je preverjalo, v kolikšni meri se prebivalci Slovenije čutijo pripadnike svojega naroda, države, občine, regije, Evrope, družine, poklica, organizacije in političnega prepričanja. Povprašalo se jih je tudi, katera je najpomembnejša osebnost v slovenski zgodovini in koliko pomembni se jim zdijo posamezni zgodovinski dogodki. Raziskovalo se je tudi katere naj bi bile tipične slovenske lastnosti – smo Slovenci delavni, pošteni, zavistni, strpni, inovativni, zaprti, odločni, tekmovalni, pogumni, solidarni? Pokazalo se je tudi, do kolikšnih sprememb je prišlo v primerjavi z lanskim letom. Med aktualnimi vprašanji se je ugotavljalo, ali je predsednik vlade Pahor z vidika javnega mnenja ravnal pravilno ali dvolično, ko kljub pozivu Računskega sodišča ni zamenjal ministra Križaniča. Raziskovalo se je tudi ali po mnenju anketirancev potrebujemo korenito spremembo Ustave in ureditve Slovenije, le manjše popravke ali pa bi morali Ustavo ohraniti takšno, kakršna je. Preverjalo se je kolikšna bi utegnila biti udeležba na referendumu o Zakonu o malem delu in kakšna bi bila usoda tega zakona. Kot vedno pa se je ugotavljalo tudi razmerja med političnimi strankami in (ne)podporo sedanji vladi.
The set of questions about Slovenian identity and history examined the extent to which Slovenian residents feel as a members of their nation, state, country, region, Europe, family, profession, organization, and political belief. They were also asked which the most important figure is in Slovenian history and how important they consider particular historical events. There was also explored what should be the characteristics of a typical Slovenian – are Slovenes hardworking, honest, jealous, tolerant, innovative, closed, determined, competitive, brave, solidary? It has also shown to what changes have come compared to the last year. Among the current issues it was examined whether the Prime Minister in terms of public opinion acted properly or hypocritical when, despite a prompt by the Court of Audit, he didn't change minister Križanič. It was also examined whether according to respondents' opinion we need radical change of the Constitution and legislation of Slovenia, only minor adjustments or we should keep the Constitution such as it is. The survey also checked what might be the participation in the referendum on the mini jobs act and what would be the fate of this Act. As always, the relationship between political parties and (un)supporting current government was examined.
Verjetnostno: stratificiranoProbability.Stratified
Probability: StratifiedProbability.Stratified
Telefonski intervju: CATIInterview.Telephone.CATI
Telephone interview: Computer-assisted (CATI)Interview.Telephone.CATI
