Raziskava preučuje pojavnost in reprodukcijo populističnega ter afektivnega komuniciranja v interpretativnem žanru časopisnega komentarja dveh izbranih dnevnih časopisov, Dela in Slovenskih novic, v obdobju sprememb migracijske in begunske zakonodaje v Sloveniji (obdobje med 2015 in 2019). Raziskovalna skupina je s pomočjo metode okvirjanja časopisnim komentarjem v izbranih dveh časopisih določila okvirje, s katerimi novinarji_ke v besedilih definirajo fenomene kot družbene probleme in znotraj katerih implicitno ali eksplicitno vključujejo oziroma ponujajo tudi rešitve. Končni vzorec analize je zamejen zgolj na tiste časopisne komentarje, ki v svoji argumentaciji vsebujejo strukturiran in pomensko relevanten par: eksplicitno definicijo problema in eksplicitno predlagano rešitev definiranega problema. Strukturirani okvirji, ki vsebujejo par problem (diagnoza) – rešitev (prognoza), ki jih je raziskovalna skupina prepoznala v besedilih, tako predstavljajo temeljne enote analize. Analiza okvirjanja znotraj komunikativnega procesa okvirjanja predpostavlja in v analiziranih besedilih omogoča zaznavanje določene nelingvistične ali nekognitivne lastnosti okvirjenih problemov in rešitev. Tako je raziskovalna skupina v besedilih vsem okvirjem, tj. vsem parom, določila tudi afekte, ki se naključno ali namensko vpenjajo ter prepletajo s pomeni in stališči v besedilih, tako okvirje kot afekte pa so v besedilih povezovali s tremi populističnimi antagonizmi, ki okvirjajo migracijsko tematiko: proti-elitizem, osrediščenost na ljudstvo, drugost. Zaradi specifičnega načina razširjanja populističnih antagonizmov v medijih je medijski populizem v vsakem paru (problem-rešitev) kodiran na dveh ravneh, prvič kot populizem skozi medije in drugič, kot populizem s strani medijev. Populizem skozi medije zaznamuje prisotnost treh populističnih antagonizmov, ki jih izrekajo zunanji glasovi (npr. politiki), na katere se novinarji opirajo, zato pojav dimenzionirajo tri spremenljivke: proti-elitizem, osrediščenost na ljudstvo, drugost. Populizem s strani medijev označuje novinarje kot akterje, ki aktivno poustvarjajo populistično komuniciranje, kot tiste akterje, ki populizem zgolj tematsko obravnavajo ali kot akterje, ki etiketirajo druge kot populiste. Pojav s tremi dimenzijami operacionalizirajo s pomočjo petih spremenljivk: proti-elitizem, osrediščenost na ljudstvo, drugost, populizem kot fenomen, populistični akter_ka.
The research examines the occurrence and reproduction of populist and affective communication in the interpretive genre of newspaper commentary of two selected daily newspapers in Slovenia, Delo and Slovenske novice, in the period of changes in migration and refugee legislation in Slovenia (period between 2015 and 2019). Using the method of framing, the researchers analyse the newspaper commentaries in the two newspapers in order to examine the frames, used by the journalists when defining social phenomena as problems within which they implicitly or explicitly include or offer solutions in their texts. The final sample of the analysis is limited to those newspaper commentaries that contain in their argumentation a structured and semantically relevant pair: an explicit definition of the problem and an explicitly proposed solution to the defined problem. Structured frameworks containing a pair of problem (diagnosis) - solution (prognosis) identified by the research team in the texts thus represent fundamental units of analysis. The analysis of framing within the communicative framing process presupposes and enables the perception of a certain non-linguistic or non-cognitive property of framed problems and solutions in the analyzed texts. So is the research team in texts to all frameworks, i.e. all couples, also identified affects that are randomly or intentionally intertwined and intertwined with meanings and positions in the texts, and both frames and affects were linked in the texts to three populist antagonisms that they frame migration themes: anti-elitism, people-centeredness, otherness. Due to the specific way in which populist antagonisms are spread in the media, media populism in each pair (problem-solution) is coded on two levels, for the first time as populism through the media and secondly, like populism on the part of the media. Populism through the media is marked by the presence of three populist antagonisms uttered by outside voices (e.g. politicians) on which journalists rely, so the phenomenon is dimensioned three variables: anti-elitism, people-centeredness, and otherness. Populism by the media describes journalists as actors who actively recreate populist communication, as those actors who deal with populism only thematically or as actors who label others as populists. They operationalize the phenomenon with three dimensions with the help of five variables: anti-elitism, focus on the people, otherness, populism as a phenomenon, populist actor.
Neverjetnostno: namenskoNonprobability.Purposive
Non-probability: PurposiveNonprobability.Purposive
Other
Kodiranje vsebine.
Content coding
