Eye Tracking the Use of a Collapsible Facets Panel in a Search Interface

Facets can provide an interesting functionality in digital libraries. However, while some research shows facets are important, other research found facets are only moderately used. Therefore, in this exploratory study we compare two search interfaces; one where the facets panel is always visible and one where the facets panel is hidden by default. Our main research question is “Is folding the facets panel in a digital library search interface beneficial to academic users?” By performing an eye tracking study with N=24, we measured search efficiency, distribution of attention and user satisfaction. We found no significant differences in the eye tracking data nor in usability feedback and conclude that collapsing facets is neither beneficial nor detrimental.

This dataset contains the eye tracking data and user satisfaction data.

Identifier
DOI https://doi.org/10.17026/dans-zm9-zprb
PID https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:nl:ui:13-lvo4-9k
Metadata Access https://easy.dans.knaw.nl/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_datacite&identifier=oai:easy.dans.knaw.nl:easy-dataset:54642
Provenance
Creator Kemman, MJ; Kleppe, M.; Maarseveen, J.
Publisher Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
Publication Year 2013
Rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess; License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0; http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0
OpenAccess true
Representation
Language English
Resource Type Dataset
Format PDF; MS Word; MS Excel; SPSS
Discipline Humanities
Spatial Coverage Netherlands