Do You Need Instructions Again? Predicting Wayfinding Instruction Demand

DOI

How to Cite?

Alinaghi, N., Kwok, T. C., Kiefer, P., & Giannopoulos, I. (2023, September). Do You Need Instructions Again? Predicting Wayfinding Instruction Demand. In GIScience 2023.

Abstract

The demand for instructions during wayfinding, defined as the frequency of requesting instructions for each decision point, can be considered as an important indicator of the internal cognitive processes during wayfinding. This demand can be a consequence of the mental state of feeling lost, being uncertain, mind wandering, having difficulty following the route, etc. Therefore, it can be of great importance for theoretical cognitive studies on human perception of the environment. From an application perspective, this demand can be used as a measure of the effectiveness of the navigation assistance system. It is therefore worthwhile to be able to predict this demand and also to know what factors trigger it. This paper takes a step in this direction by reporting a successful prediction of instruction demand (accuracy of 78.4%) in a real-world wayfinding experiment with 45 participants, and interpreting the environmental, user, instructional, and gaze-related features that caused it.

Material

All data is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, and all software files are licensed under the MIT License. 

Data: A CSV file containing 75 computed features for classifying instruction demand. These include 41 Environmental, 16 Instruction-, 12 User-related, and 6 Gaze features. Detailed explanations of all features and how they are computed are provided in the accompanying paper. But here you can see a summary of these features: 

Environmental Features:

unified-segment

distance from/to previous/next turn junctions

distance from/to previous/next non-turn junctions

segment-length

route-length

time passed since start

landuse

PoI

User Features:

demographics

gender (binary)

age (in years)

familiarity (binary)

Big Five Personality traits

Spatial Strategies Questionnaire FRS

Instruction Features

length-related

number of words

number of characters

content-related

OSM PoI

landmark OSM type

contains-street-names (boolean)

last instruction (boolean)

Gaze Features

fixation count

min/max/sd fixation

mean fixation duration

fixation duration skewness

Code: The analysis code used in the paper is available as a Jupyter Notebook.

Identifier
DOI https://doi.org/10.48436/g7b46-42j36
Related Identifier IsSupplementTo https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.GIScience.2023.1
Related Identifier IsVersionOf https://doi.org/10.48436/yyhjf-bsh02
Metadata Access https://researchdata.tuwien.ac.at/oai2d?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_datacite&identifier=oai:researchdata.tuwien.ac.at:g7b46-42j36
Provenance
Creator Alinaghi, Negar
Publisher TU Wien
Publication Year 2024
Rights Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International; MIT License; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode; https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
OpenAccess true
Contact tudata(at)tuwien.ac.at
Representation
Resource Type ComputationalNotebook
Version 1.0.0
Discipline Other