New and emerging forms of violence data for crisis response: A comparative analysis in Kenya 2017

DOI

This dataset compares different media sources reporting on violent events, using the 2017 Kenyan elections as a case study. It compares reports generated through traditional media, using the ACLED database (a much used source for comparing traditional media reports), to Twitter reports of violence, using a novel method for combing Twitter for violence related tweets, using an algorithm developed by the Department of Informatics at the University of Sussex (named Method 52), along three dimensions: 1) Geography and geographical coverage 2) Temporality- timeliness, temporal coverage and time precision and 3) Targeting/representativeness.The project will produce a robust evidence base on the opportunities and limitations of social media data on violence reporting to inform UK emergency and crisis response, in the context of violence monitoring in Kenya. Effective UK Government crisis and emergency response increasingly depends on the availability of timely, reliable data on political violence, to determine the scale and dimensions of crises and tailor responses. While social media reports of violence can inform the design, targeting, and geography of crisis response, there is limited robust research on their reliability and comprehensiveness. This project addresses this gap, by testing reliability and comprehensiveness of social media data, against conventional media reporting of violence in a real-time context: the August 2017 Kenyan elections. It will identify opportunities new data provide for policy, and what limitations restrict usability, along three dimensions: 1) reporting timeliness; 2) targeting of crisis response; and 3) geographies of violence risk. Building on extensive social media use in Kenya, and a history of violence reporting via social media the case facilitates a test of social media data in a promising context. The project is being carried out in partnership with researchers at the University of Sussex, the Armed Conflict Location & Event Dataset (ACLED), and the Centre for Human Rights and Policy Studies (CHRIPS) in Nairobi, Kenya.

Developed a novel and original methodology to compare different media sources reporting on violent events, using the 2017 Kenyan elections as a case study. The study has compared reports generated through traditional media, using the ACLED database (a much used source for comparing traditional media reports), to Twitter reports of violence, using a novel method for combing Twitter for violence related tweets, using an algorithm developed by the Department of Informatics at the University of Sussex (named Method 52), along three dimensions: 1) Geography and geographical coverage 2) Temporality- timeliness, temporal coverage and time precision and 3) Targeting/representativeness.

Identifier
DOI https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-853367
Metadata Access https://datacatalogue.cessda.eu/oai-pmh/v0/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_ddi25&identifier=3fb365acfb1827c1584ce857db44694c19cca8d2ea8aa83e97d5e6b751a90425
Provenance
Creator Justino, P, Institute for Development Studies; Marchais, G, Institute of Development Studies; Dowd, C, Institute of Development Studies; Kishi, R, ACLED
Publisher UK Data Service
Publication Year 2020
Funding Reference Economic and Social Research Council
Rights Patricia Justino, Institute of Development Studies; The Data Collection is available to any user without the requirement for registration for download/access.
OpenAccess true
Representation
Language English
Resource Type Numeric; Text
Discipline Social Sciences
Spatial Coverage United Kingdom; Kenya