The data collection consists of two data sets formatted as SPSS files. The first data set derived from a GPS tracking methodology and records the amount of time that Catholic and Protestant residents of north Belfast spend in different types of spaces at different times of the day. The second data set is derived from a questionnaire survey designed to explore such residents' attitudes towards use of spaces beyond their own communities and to measure some social psychological factors that might impact on such attitudes, including intergroup contact, prejudice, threat and group identity.This research develops a new approach to segregation between groups, taking sectarian relations in Belfast as a case study. In so doing, it proposes a theoretical and methodological framework that can be applied to other historically divided cities. Previous research has focused on (relatively) stable patterns of division entrenched within global institutions of residence, employment or education. We hold that such work may be enriched by research that treats segregation as the dynamic outcome of individuals' routine movements as they travel the city, using its pathways, amenities and activity spaces and coming into contact with certain kinds of people, while avoiding others. Our project entails closely related work of theoretical, methodological and empirical innovation. Theoretically, we will integrate work on the psychology of intergroup contact with work on the time-geography of everyday behaviour. That is, we will show how time-geographic concepts (e.g. 'space-time path') can explain how segregation is reproduced through the day-by-day timing and spacing of individuals' movements and activities and, by implication, through the temporal and spatial 'constraints' to which they are subject. Correspondingly, we will show how such movements and activities express psychological processes. We will focus specifically on the role of different forms of perceived intergroup threat (e.g. symbolic, realistic and environmental threat), exploring how such threats interact with other social and psychological factors in order to sustain or undermine a 'behavioural ecology' of separation. Methodologically, our research will capitalize on new techniques for tracking and analyzing individuals' movements through urban areas. By implementing a novel combination of GPS technology, Geographic Information Systems (GIS), interviews, and standard questionnaire techniques, we will show how segregation may arise through the timing and spacing of everyday behaviour and how this process is shaped by social and psychological factors. Empirically, our project will entail the collection of new kinds of data on sectarian divisions in North Belfast. Initially, we will use a combination of 'walking interview' and GIS methods to map how Catholic and Protestant residents use and make sense of everyday activity spaces, exploring how their understanding of those spaces and pathways are territorially organised. Then, we will conduct a questionnaire survey with a representative sample of people living in North Belfast (n = 500), designed to tap their perceptions of intergroup threat along with a range of other social psychological variables. Finally, using a combination of GPS tracking and GIS methods, we will track the mobility patterns and activity space use over time of the same respondents who completed the questionnaire phase. Our analysis will explore the degree to which residents use activity spaces located in areas of varying sectarian compositions and pass along time-space pathways that increase or reduce their exposure to other communities. It will also explore how social, psychological and environmental factors predict resulting practices of segregation and integration. Our research will help to develop a new approach to studying, evidencing and explaining segregation, which can be transferred to other contexts in which the problem of segregation arises. It will also inform interventions to combat sectarian polarization in Belfast at a time when the government is investing heavily in this ideal. Evidence on mobility patterns in the city, for instance, may enrich knowledge about the nature of the real or imagined constraints placed on residents' routine movements and pathways, the accessibility of public facilities, and the use of public transport. As important, it may reveal emerging spaces of integration and help to identify the kinds of people, social practices and environmental factors that are breaking down boundaries to contact.

Study 1: This study involved GPS tracking of the movements of Catholic and Protestant residents of north Belfast (n=181), focusing on five areas in which residents of these two communities live in close proximity to one another. GIS data capture methods then enabled exploration of the patterning of time spent in different kinds of activity spaces (shared, predominantly protestant and predominantly Catholic), as well as the locations of participants’ destinations. Our methodology also allowed exploration of variations across community membership (Catholic/Protestant), time of day (morning, afternoon, evening), age and gender (male-female). Study 2: This follow up questionnaire survey (n=488) was conducted with a sample of residents drawn from the same areas that featured in study 1. Participants completed a questionnaire measuring, among other variables, their positive and negative contact experiences, perceptions of realistic and symbolic threat, anxiety about intergroup contact, and willingness to use activity spaces outside their own ethno-political community. The full questionnaire has been filed with this data set. Participants in both studies comprised a non-random sample recruited using door-to-door sampling in the selected areas of north Belfast, namely (1) Ballysillan/Ligoniel, (2) Glandore/Skegoneill, (3) Tiger’s Bay/New Lodge, (4) Ardoyne/Glenbryn, and (5) Greater Whitewell. Further details on our methodology are filed in the documentation that accompanies this data collection.