fish vs toxins

The main aim of the project has been fully reached and confirmed our hypothesis that fish can escape from cyanobacterial bloom. The echograms of the “bloom border” have shown that fish crowded in a clean water just at the border, while very few fish were found within the bloom. Fish and cyanobacterial biomass were showing opposite trends with less fish encountered as intensity of bloom was increasing. Mean

Identifier
Source https://deims.org/dataset/d6983a78-df8c-4afc-b18b-606c24ba7def
Related Identifier https://b2share.eudat.eu/records/528351e3dc4342edb470721d0de59081
Related Identifier https://deims.org/api/datasets/d6983a78-df8c-4afc-b18b-606c24ba7def
Metadata Access https://deims.org/pycsw/catalogue/csw?service=CSW&version=2.0.2&request=GetRecordById&Id=d6983a78-df8c-4afc-b18b-606c24ba7def&outputSchema=http://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmd
Provenance
Publisher European Regional Centre for Ecohydrology
Contributor DEIMS-SDR Site and Dataset registry deims.org
Publication Year 2017
Rights No conditions apply to access and use; Co-authorship on publications resulting from use of the dataset public access limited according to Article 13(1)(g) of the INSPIRE Directive
OpenAccess true
Representation
Discipline Environmental Monitoring
Spatial Coverage (19.941W, 51.443S, 19.941E, 51.443N)