DNA samples from genetic monitoring of the Common Hamster (Cricetus cricetus) in the Netherlands

Reintroductions have become more popular to prevent species from extinction in the wild. However, reintroductions inevitably result in small populations with poor genetic status. Systematic demographic and genetic monitoring is needed to optimize conservation actions like reintroductions. Here we show how genetic monitoring was useful and informative in a reintroduction project for the highly endangered Common hamster (Cricetus cricetus) in the Netherlands and Belgium. An initial loss of genetic diversity could be detected in some of the reintroduced populations, but it could be shown that due to following supplementation, extra releases in established populations, genetic diversity and also effective population size in the wild stabilized or even increased.

Samples for the DNA analysis in this study were collected within the conservation and breeding program on a regular basis since 1999 and in the wild whenever possible, including tissue from dead hamsters. All samples were genotyped for a maximum of eight polymorphic microsatellite loci: Ccrμ10, Ccrμ11, Ccrμ12, Ccrμ15, Ccrμ17, Ccrμ19, Ccrμ20 (Neumann & Jansman 2004) and Cricri-IPK02 (Jakob & Mammen 2006). All loci had only two different alleles. In our study we used 818 genetic profiles, of which 268 profiles are from wild-sampled individuals and 550 from individuals of the captive breeding program that were released into the wild. The individuals that were used for reintroduction were exactly known due to the Studbook of the European hamster which is managed by Rotterdam Zoo (de Boer 2014). However, not all genetic profiles of released individuals were available and missing genetic profiles were inferred by reconstructing the total pedigree, with known genotypes from founders and their descendants as input.

The file Hamster_Genotypes_200520_csv has the following columns: Column 1 AREA = (populations in the Netherlands: NL1, AMBY, HEER, SIBBE, PUTH, SITTARD, populations in Belgium: BERTEM, TONGEREN, population in Germany: GER1) Column 2 Time/Period = Timing of sampling of the population (t0, t1 or t2) or the specific release (r1 = first, r2 = second or r3 =third) Column 3 Released/Wild = Released hamster or wild hamster Column 4 Year = Year of sampling/release Column 5 Sample = Unique ID of each sample Column 6 Pop = Code for each population at a specific moment in time Column 7-8 CCR10-CCR10 = different alleles for locus 10 Column 9-10 CCR11-CCR11 = different alleles for locus 11 Column 11-12 CCR12-CCR12 = different alleles for locus 12 Column 13-14 CCR15-CCR15 = different alleles for locus 15 Column 15-16 CCR17-CCR17 = different alleles for locus 17 Column 17-18 CCR19-CCR19 = different alleles for locus 19 Column 19-20 CCR20l-CCR20l = different alleles for locus 20l Column 21-22 Cri2l-Cri2l = different alleles for locus Cri2l Each row is an individual

Identifier
DOI https://doi.org/10.17026/dans-z3w-nsx9
PID https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:nl:ui:13-wj-1kxd
Metadata Access https://easy.dans.knaw.nl/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_datacite&identifier=oai:easy.dans.knaw.nl:easy-dataset:163029
Provenance
Creator La Haye, M.J.J.; Koelewijn, H.P.; Raedts, R.; Reiners, T.E.; Verbist, V.
Publisher Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
Contributor Radboud University
Publication Year 2020
Rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess; License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
OpenAccess true
Representation
Language English
Resource Type Dataset
Format application/pdf; csv
Discipline Biology; Life Sciences