-
Ultra-violet measurements from station Izaña (2016-01)
This dataset has no description
-
Ultra-violet measurements from station Izaña (2015-12)
This dataset has no description
-
Ultra-violet measurements from station Izaña (2015-11)
This dataset has no description
-
Ultra-violet measurements from station Izaña (2015-10)
This dataset has no description
-
Ultra-violet measurements from station Izaña (2015-09)
This dataset has no description
-
Ultra-violet measurements from station Izaña (2015-08)
This dataset has no description
-
Ultra-violet measurements from station Izaña (2015-07)
This dataset has no description
-
Ultra-violet measurements from station Izaña (2010-08)
This dataset has no description
-
Ultra-violet measurements from station Izaña (2010-06)
This dataset has no description
-
Ultra-violet measurements from station Izaña (2010-01)
This dataset has no description
-
Ultra-violet measurements from station Izaña (2009-12)
This dataset has no description
-
Ultra-violet measurements from station Izaña (2009-11)
This dataset has no description
-
Ultra-violet measurements from station Izaña (2009-10)
This dataset has no description
-
Ultra-violet measurements from station Izaña (2009-09)
This dataset has no description
-
Ultra-violet measurements from station Izaña (2009-08)
This dataset has no description
-
Ultra-violet measurements from station Izaña (2009-07)
This dataset has no description
-
Ultra-violet measurements from station Izaña (2009-06)
This dataset has no description
-
Ultra-violet measurements from station Izaña (2009-05)
On 2017-08-04 it was noted, that the UV-b values given here were 100 times to high (300 instead of 3 W/m²). The values for UV-b have been recalculated and are now correct. -
Ultra-violet measurements from station Izaña (2009-04)
On 2017-08-04 it was noted, that the UV-b values given here were 100 times to high (300 instead of 3 W/m²). The values for UV-b have been recalculated and are now correct. -
Ultra-violet measurements from station Izaña (2009-03)
On 2017-08-04 it was noted, that the UV-b values given here were 100 times to high (300 instead of 3 W/m²). The values for UV-b have been recalculated and are now correct. The...