Comparison of two models for serious games analysis

Dataset

DOI PID

In this study, we investigated users' perception of the usability and usefulness of two models for educational serious games analysis: Activity Theory-based Model of Serious Games (ATMSG) and Learning Mechanics–Game Mechanics (LM–GM). The goal was to obtain early user feedback on ATMSG in order to address issues, particularly on usability, before proceeding with more extensive user testing.

Identifier
DOI	https://doi.org/10.17026/dans-zeg-uxph
PID	https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:nl:ui:13-r5t6-mn
Metadata Access	https://easy.dans.knaw.nl/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_datacite&identifier=oai:easy.dans.knaw.nl:easy-dataset:61122

Provenance
Creator	Carvalho, M. B.
Publisher	Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
Contributor	Bellotti, F.; Berta, R.; De Gloria, A.; Islas Sedano, C.; Baalsrud Hauge, J.; Hu, J.; Rauterberg, M.
Publication Year	2015
Rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess; License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0; http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0
OpenAccess	true

Representation
Language	English
Resource Type	Dataset
Format	CSV; PDF
Discipline	Design; Fine Arts, Music, Theatre and Media Studies; Humanities