TURTLS Light curves of ^56^Ni distributions

DOI

Recent studies have shown how the distribution of ^56^Ni within the ejected material of type Ia supernovae can have profound consequences on the observed light curves. Observations at early times can therefore provide important details on the explosion physics in thermonuclear supernovae, which are poorly constrained. To this end, we present a series of radiative transfer calculations that explore variations in the ^56^Ni distribution. Our models also show the importance of the density profile in shaping the light curve, which is often neglected in the literature. Using our model set, we investigate the observations that are necessary to determine the 56Ni distribution as robustly as possible within the current model set. Additionally, we find that this includes observations beginning at least 14 days before B-band maximum, extending to approximately maximum light with a relatively high (<~3 day) cadence, and in at least one blue and one red band are required (such as B and R, or g and r). We compare a number of well-observed type Ia supernovae that meet these criteria to our models and find that the light curves of 70-80% of objects in our sample are consistent with being produced solely by variations in the ^56^Ni distributions. The remaining supernovae show an excess of flux at early times, indicating missing physics that is not accounted for within our model set, such as an interaction or the presence of short-lived radioactive isotopes. Comparing our model light curves and spectra to observations and delayed detonation models demonstrates that while a somewhat extended ^56^Ni distribution is necessary to reproduce the observed light curve shape, this does not negatively affect the spectra at maximum light. Investigating current explosion models shows that observations typically require a shallower decrease in the ^56^Ni mass towards the outer ejecta than is produced for models of a given ^56^Ni mass. Future models that test differences in the explosion physics and detonation criteria should be explored to determine the conditions necessary to reproduce the 56Ni distributions found here.

Identifier
DOI http://doi.org/10.26093/cds/vizier.36340037
Source https://dc.g-vo.org/rr/q/lp/custom/CDS.VizieR/J/A+A/634/A37
Related Identifier https://cdsarc.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/cat/J/A+A/634/A37
Related Identifier http://vizier.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/VizieR-2?-source=J/A+A/634/A37
Metadata Access http://dc.g-vo.org/rr/q/pmh/pubreg.xml?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_b2find&identifier=ivo://CDS.VizieR/J/A+A/634/A37
Provenance
Creator Magee M.R.; Maguire K.; Kotak R.; Sim S.A.; Gillanders J.H.; Prentice S.J.,Skillen K.
Publisher CDS
Publication Year 2020
Rights https://cds.unistra.fr/vizier-org/licences_vizier.html
OpenAccess true
Contact CDS support team <cds-question(at)unistra.fr>
Representation
Resource Type Dataset; AstroObjects
Discipline Astrophysics and Astronomy; Natural Sciences; Observational Astronomy; Physics; Stellar Astronomy